Search Results for "suitable accommodation"

287 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines for Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Suo Motu Writ Petition. Court directs State of Goa to establish detention centres and formulate standard operating procedures for handling foreign nationals who overstay their visas.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa, arising from a criminal writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Against Permanent Alimony and Residential Accommodation for Wife Under Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Family Court's Order for Rs.5,000 Monthly Maintenance and Rs.3,00,000 for Housing Upheld as Husband Failed to Show Changed Circumstances.

The appellant husband and respondent wife were married under Hindu law. The Family Court dissolved the marriage by an ex parte decree of divorce under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition for Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Appellate Court's Order Set Aside as It Erroneously Mixed Bonafide Need with Demolition Requirement.

The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Sharandas Sharma, a retired Sub Divisional Officer, filed a suit for eviction against the respondent tenant, Shrikrushna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Directing Allotment of Flat by MHADA. Commission lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate proprietary rights under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), a statutory authority for housing development in Maharashtra, challenged a...