Search Results for "special planning authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "special planning authority"

1155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).

3 Apr 2019

The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by Pune Municipal Corporation Based on Proposed Prison Construction — Petitioner's Project Found Beyond 150 Meters from Prison Perimeter Wall, No Legal Basis for Restriction. The court held that rules under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894, do not regulate construction beyond the perimeter walls of a Central Prison, and that property rights under Article 300A of the Constitution cannot be interfered with based on future proposals without legal backing.

27 Aug 2024

The Petitioner, Fortune Developers and Infrastructure, owned a portion of property surveyed under No.154 at Yerawada, Pune, and had already constructe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

11 Jun 2014

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Landowner's Withdrawal of Consent for TDR Valid Due to Acquiring Body's Delay. The court held that the land reserved for a primary school stood released from reservation as the acquiring body failed to acquire the land within the statutory period, and the landowner's withdrawal of consent for TDR was valid due to the acquiring body's delay.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gut No. 114 in Village Pimprala, Jalgaon, within the municipal limits of Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, sought...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

4 Oct 2022

The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Time to Produce Documents in Unauthorized Construction Case Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. Court Holds that Building Constructed in 2005 Without Plan Permission and in Violation of Setback Rules is Not Eligible for Regularization Under Section 113-A of the Act, Citing Supreme Court Precedent on Demolition of Illegal Structures.

19 Feb 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 14.05.2024 by the A...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)