Search Results for "siphoning"

Trending :

Search Results for "siphoning"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Railway Accident Case, Enhances Compensation for Death of Anil Jindal. Negligence of Railway Administration Established as Train Hit Deceased at Unmanned Level Crossing Without Warning.

9 Jul 2026

The case arises from a railway accident at an unmanned level crossing in Jalna, where a train hit a vehicle driven by Anil Jindal, resulting in his de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses Called by Defendant in Money Suit — Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The trial court's order treating DWs 3 and 4 as hostile and permitting the defendant to cross-examine them was set aside as premature and prejudicial to the plaintiff.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Permitting Cross-Examination of Hostile Witnesses in Money Suit. The court held that Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, allows the court to permit cross-examination of a witness by the party who called him if the witness appears hostile, and such discretion is not limited to witnesses called by the opposite party.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order as Violative of Service Rules and Natural Justice. Transfer of Regional Manager to Mumbai set aside for non-compliance with Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and breach of principles of natural justice.

28 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Ramesh Janardhan Meshram, a retired Regional Manager of Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation, challenged his transfer orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Reject Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance. Suit for specific performance of agreement for sale filed after ten years from the stipulated date of performance is barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which rejected their app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.

6 Dec 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Onerous Bail Conditions in Commercial Dispute Case — Directs Defreezing of Bank Account. Court held that imposing condition of depositing Rs.59 crore for bail in a case arising from a commercial transaction is unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Vyomesh Shah, Kiran Contractor, and Suhass Dumbre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)