Search Results for "share control"

1517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant Company's Revision Against Jurisdiction Under PSCC Act. Company Failed to Prove Paid-Up Share Capital Below Rs.1 Crore to Avail Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 12) against M/s. New Era Fabrics Ltd., the original de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...