Search Results for "sham document"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Order Allowing DNA Test Under Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC in Partition Suit. Petition Raises Questions of Right to Privacy Under Article 21 and Applicability of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the third defendant in a partition suit, O.S. No. 89 of 2016, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals in Ceiling Act Surplus Land Dispute. Oral Agreement to Sale with Possession Did Not Reduce Original Owner's Holding Under Sections 2(14) and 8 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceilings of Holdings) Act, 1961.

The matter concerned Letters Patent Appeals filed by transferees and the original owner against the dismissal of writ petitions arising from surplus l...