Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

Trending :

Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Mamlatdar's Courts Act Case Upholding Revision Order Quashing Tahsildar's Directions. Tahsildar Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Directions Affecting Non-Party Without Hearing Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906, Violating Natural Justice Principles.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from Rasta Case No. 54 of 2020 filed by respondent no. 4 against the petitioners before the Tahsildar, Parner under Section 5 o...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order Rejecting NA Permission Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act — Directs Reconsideration on Grounds of Non-Application of Mind. The Collector's order was set aside for failing to consider the application on merits and for lack of reasons, amounting to non-application of mind.

13 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Hothaji Khodaji Thakor, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order dated 04.10.2025 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Tenancy Dispute, Restores Orders of Agricultural Land Tribunal and SDO. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landholder Damodar, challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Handles Writ Petition and Interim Application in Agricultural Land Dispute. The court deals with a long-pending writ petition from 1998 and a 2023 interim application in a matter involving agricultural land in Sangli district.

2 Apr 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Tenanted and Untenanted Lands. Reference Court's dismissal of enhancement set aside; appellant entitled to higher compensation based on comparable sale instances and previous awards.

11 Feb 2022

The appellant, Pandurang Daji Naik, owned lands at Torcem, Pernem Goa, which were acquired by the State for the construction of B/6 distributaries of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order; Upholds Rent Controller's Jurisdiction Despite Absence of Written Lease Under Goa Rent Control Act, 1968. The Court Holds Section 34 of the Act to be Directory, Not Mandatory, and Refuses to Interfere with Concurrent Findings of Fact That the Tenant's Denial of Title Was Not Bonafide.

1 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Abdul Sattar Kulli, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Revision Order in Eviction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Default. The court held that the petitioners failed to prove that the suit house was not a mundkar tenancy and that the eviction decree was validly passed under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

18 Apr 2016

The petitioners, legal heirs of original defendants in Civil Suit No. 107 of 1970, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14.01.2015 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

21 Aug 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Administrative Tribunal's Order in Mundkar Registration Case — Revision Not Maintainable Under Section 25 of Goa Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court held that a revision under Section 25 lies only against orders passed in appeal under Section 24 or under sub-section (2) of Section 25, not against an order passed under Section 29(8) of the Act.

23 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Miss Telma Gonsalves, challenged an order dated 29.07.2010 passed by the learned Administrative Tribunal, which had allowed a revision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Agreement to Sell Despite Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. Court Holds That Time Was Not of Essence in Absence of Express Stipulation and That Possession Delivered Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance.

16 Dec 2005

The dispute arose out of an agreement to sell dated 1st June 1978 executed by the original defendant No.2 (since deceased, represented by appellants) ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)