Search Results for "rehabilitation plot"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "rehabilitation plot"

351 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Despite Pending CIRP Under IBC — Section 14 IBC Does Not Bar Competent Authority from Exercising Jurisdiction Under Section 11(3) MOFA. The Court held that the statutory right of flat purchasers to obtain deemed conveyance under MOFA cannot be defeated by the pendency of insolvency proceedings against the promoter.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Darshan Mandir Co-operative Housing Society Limited, is a cooperative housing society formed by purchasers of flats in a building cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors

24 Feb 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society and quashed the order rejecting its application for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

20 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

23 Nov 2022

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Establish Right to Retain Tenement After Ceasing to Be Eligible Slum Dweller.

22 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Harshaben Madhu, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 07/02/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Developer. Appointment of Arbitrator Without Mutual Consent Held Invalid Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Nov 2014

The petitioners, a proposed cooperative housing society and its members, entered into a development agreement with the respondent, a developer, for re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)