KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "reference court award"
5890 result(s) found
Found 5890 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.
1 Jan 2025The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...
- 1084
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Arrest of Judgment Debtor in Execution of Foreign Decree — Conversion Rate for Decretal Amount Must Be Determined Before Arrest. The court held that before ordering arrest under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, the exact amount payable in Indian rupees must be ascertained when the decree is in foreign currency.
13 Aug 2013The Bombay High Court dealt with three chamber summons arising out of execution proceedings of a foreign decree. The original suit was filed in Englan...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections arising from land acquisition reference proceedings. The court examines whether the compensation awarded by the Reference Court at Rs.3,06,000 per acre for irrigated lands and Rs.2,04,000 for dry lands is just, considering the challenges of inadequacy and excessiveness raised by the claimants and the State respectively.
24 Apr 2020The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising from land acquisition proceedings concer...
- 60
High Court
KAHC010448052021_1
7 Feb 2025These Miscellaneous First Appeals were filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer of Visvesvaraya Jala Nigam Limited, the acquiring body, challenging t...
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...
- 56
High Court
High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Execution of MSME Arbitral Award on Grounds of Fraud. Court Considers Whether Execution Proceedings Can Be Quashed When Award Was Not Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Despite Participation in Arbitration.
1 Sep 2025The petitioner, Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited, floated a tender for supply of drugs and disposable delivery kits. The responden...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.
13 Feb 2018The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...
- 94
Supreme Court
Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law
18 Jul 2024This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...
- 348
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Appellant Entitled to Same Rate as Other Land Owners in Similar Acquisition. The Court held that the appellant's application under Section 28-A was maintainable and not barred by limitation, and directed re-determination of compensation at Rs. 250 per sq.ft. after 35% deduction for development.
13 Mar 2023The appellant, Namdeo Banduji Mahure, owned land in Mouza Arni, District Yavatmal, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the construction...
- 100
