Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Society's Right to Develop Land in Siddharth Nagar, Rejects MHADA's Claim of Ownership. The court held that the cooperative society representing occupants of Patra chawls is entitled to development rights over 10 acres of land as per government resolution, and MHADA cannot unilaterally terminate the development agreement.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves a dispute over the development of land in Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai. The Bombay Housing and Area Development Board (now MHAD...

High Court

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

8 Mar 2016

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme for Koli Fisherfolk Community — No Locus Standi Found as Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Interest in the Subject Land. The Court Held That the Petitioners, Being Societies Not Directly Affected by the Development, Could Not Maintain a Public Interest Litigation for Alleged Violations of CRZ Norms and Fisheries Act.

16 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Danda Koli Masemari Vyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and Danda Koli Samaj, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

30 Oct 2014

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Cancellation of Letter of Intent for Non-Compliance. Failure to Obtain Commencement Certificate Within Validity Period Results in Forfeiture of Rights Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (I.C.&R.) Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, M/s. Morya Homes, a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, was issued a Letter of Intent (LOI) by the Slum Rehabilitat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SRA's Refusal to Register Society for Slum Redevelopment. Court holds that SRA cannot refuse registration of a cooperative society of eligible slum dwellers merely because the developer has not been appointed, and that the right to form a society is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.

7 Nov 2023

The petitioners, 21 slum dwellers residing in Chunabhatti, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Filed by Cooperative Society Against MHADA and Others — Claims for Conveyance Deed and Challenge to Eviction Found Without Merit. The Court Upholds the Validity of the Lease Deed and Inclusion of Occupants in Slum Redevelopment Scheme Under Slum Act Section 33.

2 Apr 2016

The two writ petitions concerned a property dispute at Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, owned by MHADA. The petitioners, a cooperative housing society a...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)