Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 21(c) NDPS Act but Reduces Sentence to 16 Years. Court Holds That Section 32B Does Not Limit Sentencing Discretion to Enumerated Factors; Other Relevant Factors Like Quantity May Be Considered.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appellant, Rafiq Qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case for Possession of 2.225 kg Charas. Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act not triggered as recovery was from bag, not person.

The appellant, Krishna S/o Kavi Raj Malla, was convicted by the Special Judge of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for the offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction for Possession of 85.810 kg Ganja Set Aside as Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures Were Not Followed.

The appellants, Mobin Khan and Taslim Khan, were convicted by the learned District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special (N.D.P.S.)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure of Charas from Hotel Room Vitiated as Mandatory Procedural Safeguards Not Followed.

The appellant, Dhansur Ghartimagar, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The appellant, Essop Casoojee, a South African national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai in NDPS Special Case No.78 of 2002 for off...