Search Results for "previous owner liability"

411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Deceased Was a Third Party and No Breach of Policy Terms Established.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased, Yellappa Mallappa Belliveri, who died in a road accident on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Deceased Was a Third Party and No Breach of Policy Terms Established.

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Addition of Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Upheld Under Order I Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Effectuate Decree.

The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged an order of the trial court allowing an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Trial Court's Discretion to Add Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Under Order I Rule 10 CPC Upheld to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, allowing an application filed by res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute with BBMP — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply to compulsory acquisition of land by municipal authority as it is not a 'work contract'.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officer) under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961...