Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

821 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 821 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Whether Affidavit Verification Can Bypass Examination Under Section 200 CrPC in Cheque Dishonour Cases under Section 138 NI Act. Reference Made to Reconcile Conflicting Views on Section 145 NI Act's Impact on Summary Trial Procedure.

The Bombay High Court was seized of a reference to a Full Bench arising from Criminal Writ Petition No. 2523 of 2010, filed by the accused (Chief Fina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Dishonour of Cheque Cases, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act applies when signature and issuance of cheque are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

The appellant, Mr. Ashfaq Rasheed Shaik, filed six criminal appeals under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal dated 07.06.2018 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused Who Did Not Enter Witness Box. Acquittal Set Aside as Perverse; Accused Convicted and Fined ₹2,50,000 with Compensation to Complainant.

The appellant, Ivan Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Shivaji Tukaram Naik, by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted. Complainant's Failure to Prove Financial Capacity Does Not Automatically Discharge Accused When Execution of Cheque is Admitted.

The appellant/complainant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.12.2010 passed by the XV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused as Signature on Cheque Admitted and Statutory Notice Complied With.

The appellant, M/s. Indian Potash Limited, a company engaged in importing and marketing fertilizers, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Complainant's Failure to Prove Debt. High Court's Reversal Set Aside as Trial Court's Findings on Rebuttal of Presumption Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had reversed his acquitta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Complainant Established Ingredients Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Accused Failed to Discharge Reverse Burden Under Section 139.

The appellant, Suresh Nakra, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Murugesan Ad...