Search Results for "predeceased son's widow"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the suit for partition is governed by Article 110 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Pandurang Sitaram Pande (original plaintiff) against his brothers and other family members for a 1/5th sha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

This is a second appeal arising from a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction. The appellant, Parubai Savliram Kshatriya (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Family Court Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected. Plaint Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Adamsaheb, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 15.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit — Petitioner's Right to be Heard as Necessary Party Upheld Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Dattatraya S/o Laxman Anandkar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Shrigonda, dated 30/0...