Search Results for "possession refusal"

1520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, co-owners of ancestral land in Chehedi village within Nashik Municipal Corporation limits, filed a writ petition seeking a declaratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.

The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Land Executed in 1975, Suit Filed in 1985, Dismissed as Time-Barred and for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness.

The respondent no.1/plaintiff, a cooperative housing society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of land dated 30.1.1975, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...