Search Results for "parking dispute"

290 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that admission of storage of rubble by defendants does not negate plaintiffs' possession of eastern side of suit property.

The second appeal was filed by original defendant nos. 1 and 2 challenging concurrent judgments and decrees granting declaration of title and injuncti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Default Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Six Months Despite Demand Notice. Appellate Court's Decree of Eviction Under Section 12 of Bombay Rent Act Upheld as Tenant Did Not Tender Rent Within One Month of Notice.

The petitioner, Arun Anant Tavkar, was a tenant of Flat No.3, Suyesh, Phirozshaw Mehta Road, Vile Parle (East), Bombay. The respondent, Smt. Suhas Yes...