Search Results for "ownership period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership period"

3059 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3059 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection for Lack of Ownership Proof. Petitioner's failure to produce ownership documents for Static Roller justified rejection as non-responsive under tender conditions.

5 May 2010

The petitioners, M/s. M.E. InfraProjects (Pvt.) Ltd. and its director, challenged the rejection of their bid in response to a tender issued by the Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

19 Nov 2012

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Presumption Under Section 133 Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and Adverse Possession Not Rebutted. Mutation Entry Showing Surrender of Possession by Plaintiff Unchallenged for Over Forty Years Establishes Possession and Title by Adverse Possession.

12 Oct 2020

The dispute pertained to a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction over two agricultural lands in Pattanhunsi village, Hubballi Taluk. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

5 Feb 2024

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Municipal Notice for Building Repairs Under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Court Holds That Notice Must Be Issued to the Owner of the Property and Not to a Person in Occupation Without Ownership Rights.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Niraj Krishnakumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging a notice dated 16.11.2022 issued b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal and Release of Deposited Amount in Insolvency Case — Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Bars Enforcement Against Corporate Debtor's Assets. The cash deposit made by the corporate debtor in court is an asset belonging to the corporate debtor, and the resolution professional is entitled to its release for the resolution process.

13 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed an application filed by the Resolution Professional of Siti Networks Ltd. (corporate debtor) seeking withdrawal of Appea...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.

6 May 2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Trial Court's Finding on Ownership Held Without Jurisdiction. Court sets aside finding on ownership but confirms decree as plaintiffs proved prior possession and wrongful dispossession.

5 Jul 2013

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant against a decree passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Divisi...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)