Search Results for "mining offences"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/S SVB Stone Crushers, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri K H Suresh, filed a writ petition under Section 482 read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to aver existence of legally enforceable debt or liability.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as no averment of legally enforceable debt or liability exists.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings in C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses CBI's Petition for Cancellation of Bail in Illegal Mining Case — Computation of 90 Days Under Section 167 Cr.P.C. Commences from Date of Production Before Court, Not from Service of Body Warrant on Jail Authorities.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking can...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Alleged Irregularities in BEML Limited. Court holds that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the petition was based on unsubstantiated allegations and media reports, not credible material.

The petitioner, Mr. K. Subramanyam Sastry, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the Cent...