Search Results for "marriage promise"

317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Delay — Promise to Marry Broken Does Not Constitute Rape Under Section 376 IPC When Relationship Was Consensual and Long-Standing

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Lalu Yadav against the order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing his writ petition seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Cancel Bail in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage. Consensual Relationship Not Vitiated by Unfulfilled Marriage Promise.

The applicant, Leena Dashrath Gavkar, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing and setting aside of the bail order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Marital Rape Case Due to Compromise and Divorce. Section 376(b) IPC Not Attracted as Parties Were Divorced and Living Separately for Years.

The applicant, Madhav Khodke, a teacher, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Limitation Bar and Lack of Debt Evidence. Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Dismissed as Notice Served on 10.12.2013 and Complaint Filed on 20.01.2014, Beyond 30 Days.

The applicants, Vishnu Pavse and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of C...