Search Results for "mahazar"

642 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 642 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Intent. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhaskar Rao, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, for the murder of his wife Bhagyamma under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 148, 323, 504, 144 read with 149 IPC set aside due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence.

The complainant, Sri D Reddeppa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the judgment and ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Victim's Testimony Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Leading to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 366A, 365, 376, 114 r/w 34 IPC.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Hanmanth, alleged that his minor daughter was kidnapped and raped by the accused, Mallikarjun ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty. Conviction under Section 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused subjected his wife to cruelty for dowry or that the suicide was linked to such harassment.

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga in S.C.N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Excise Act Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 32 and 34 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 set aside as prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of illicit liquor.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by four accused persons challenging their conviction under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioners, Asim @ Asham, Dadapeer, and Muruga, were convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 104-A of the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Mines and Mineral Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of minerals beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Dinesh and Cheluvamurthy, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions and Special Judge at Mysuru in Special Case No.85/2018 for offe...