Search Results for "lump sum payment"

378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Challenge to Arbitral Award on Valuation Grounds: Court Considers Admission and Unconditional Stay. A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act questions an award's reliance on an unproven valuation report, citing procedural lapses and natural justice violations.

The petition challenges an arbitral award dated November 23, 2023, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Unpaid Consultancy Fees Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Disputed liability under Financial Advisor Agreement not admitted by company, held not a ground for winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Meghraj Capital Advisors Private Limited, filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal in Provincial Insolvency Act Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence. The High Court's limited power under Section 75(1) first proviso does not allow disturbing findings of fact, and a wrong decision on facts is according to law.

The appeal arose from insolvency proceedings in which the petitioning creditor sought annulment of two mortgages executed by the insolvents, one for R...