Search Results for "limitation under Section 275"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "limitation under Section 275"

195 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Accommodation Case Under RPwD Act 2016 - Appellant with Dysgraphia Denied Compensatory Time in NEET Exam Granted Relief. Court Upholds Statutory Rights to Reasonable Accommodation and Inclusive Education Under Sections 2(r) and 17(i) of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and Binding Nature of Examination Guidelines.

23 Nov 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 29 October 2021, which dismissed the appellant's writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Condoned Delay of 2192 Days in Filing Central Excise Appeal Due to Bona Fide Prosecution in Wrong Forum — Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applied to Exclude Time Spent in Gujarat High Court. The appellant acted with due diligence in pursuing the appeal before the Gujarat High Court, which was dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction under Section 36(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

22 Feb 2016

The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Daman Commissionerate, filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of a 2192-day delay in fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for redemption of mortgage filed after 26 years held barred by limitation and not maintainable as mortgage was not proved.

7 May 2014

The appellants, Sanjay Punamchand Pipada and Zamkubai Punamchand Pipada, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Regular Civil Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint for Non-Payment of Proper Court Fees in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 7(iv)(c) and Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 Section 6(iv)(j) require ad valorem court fees on market value where plaintiff is not in possession.

9 Feb 2010

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the plaintiffs (revision applicants) against an order of the trial court rejecting their plain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction — Finds Trial Court Erred in Holding That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Held That the Plaintiffs' Possession Was Established Through Evidence of Cultivation and Payment of Land Revenue, and the Defendants Failed to Prove Their Title.

24 Aug 2005

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of a property situated in Calangute, Go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Advocates Challenging Police Verification for Gun Licenses — No Fundamental Right to Carry Firearms. Requirement of Police Verification Under Arms Act, 1959 is a Reasonable Restriction and Not Arbitrary.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves five writ petitions filed by legal practitioners (advocates) challenging the requirement of police verification for grant of firearm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.

1 Jan 1970

The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)