Search Results for "joint family ancestral property"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Court Fee on Market Value in Partition Suit. Valuation Must Be Decided on Plaint Allegations, Not Cross-Examination Admissions, Under Sections 35(1) and 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

The writ petition arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiff (petitioner) against his brother and the legal heirs ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Allows Writ Petition, Setting Aside Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit. Plaintiff Entitled to Fixed Court Fee Under Section 35(2) as Joint Possession Presumed Unless Ouster Proved.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, by its single judge, entertained a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Preliminary Decree Granting 1/3rd Share to Plaintiffs. Court holds that plaintiffs established their claim over ancestral property and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The appeal arises from a preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.32/2015 by the Senior Civil Judge, Sirsi, decreeing the suit for partition. The plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed for Specific Performance of Contract in Ancestral Property Dispute. Ancestral property rights not established, First Appellate Court's decision upheld.

Brief Facts: Subject Matter:The case revolved around a shop measuring 11.15 square meters located in Field Survey No. 65, village Satkagbad. An a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding Custom-Based Adoption Validity. Custom Allowed Adoption Above 15 Years in Vysya Community, and Adoptee Could Not Claim Share in Natural Family Property Under Section 12(b) of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by a son who had been given in adoption in 1974 at the age of 23-24 years. The natural father died intes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal by Divided Son in Hindu Joint Family Property Dispute. Son who separated from father prior to 1956 is entitled to share in ancestral property as per Mitakshara law and Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves two regular first appeals (RFA No.100007/2014 and RFA No.100028/2014) arising from a common judgment and decree dated 25.10.2013 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Interim Relief. Court holds that property acquired by siblings after father's insolvency cannot be presumed to be joint family property without evidence of joint funds or common business.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 27 August 2013 dismissing a motion for interim relief in a suit for partition. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Partition Suit by Daughter's Son Claiming Share in Ancestral Property. Court holds that a daughter's son has a right to claim share in ancestral property and that the trial court's injunction was justified to protect the suit property pending final adjudication.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Chandrakant Gopal Desale, the son of Muktabai, who was the daughter of Sakharam. Sakharam had three childr...