Search Results for "investigation detention period"

642 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 642 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process — Quality of a Nation's Civilization Measured by Methods Used in Enforcement of Criminal Law.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting the Fundamental Right to Liberty under Article 21. Illegal Arrest of a Decorated Police Officer: Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The Bombay High Court, in the case of Sambhaji Achyutrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., addressed the illegal arrest and detention of a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Consideration of Representation. Preventive Detention Invalidated as Detaining Authority Failed to Properly Consider Detenu's Representation and Apply Mind to Material.

The petitioner, Jaggu Sardar @ Jagdish Tirathsing Labana @ Punjabi, challenged his detention order dated 14 October 2019 passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses CBI's Petition for Cancellation of Bail in Illegal Mining Case — Computation of 90 Days Under Section 167 Cr.P.C. Commences from Date of Production Before Court, Not from Service of Body Warrant on Jail Authorities.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking can...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...