Search Results for "industrial area development board"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Mill Worker's Petition Against Cancellation of Allotment Due to Non-Payment. Court Directs MHADA to Accept Payment and Hand Over Possession, Holding That Rejection of Extension Was Not Justified in Peculiar Facts.

The petitioner, Shamrav Dhondiba Kamble, a 76-year-old former mill worker, lost his job due to the 1982 mill strike and resided in his native village....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Notifications Issued in 2005 Filed in 2019 Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Sri B R Srinivas, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Surplus Airport Land to Private Parties. Court holds that acquisition under KIAD Act is for planned development and surplus land need not be returned to original owners.

The petitioners, including an RTI activist and agriculturists, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Karnataka High Court challenging the allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...