Search Results for "house sites"

414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Narayan Shivram Kavale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of Tanaji under Section 302 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal of Daughters in Partition Suit — Upholds Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Daughters Held Entitled to Coparcenary Rights Under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Despite Non-Joinder of Some Parties.

The case pertains to a partition suit filed by the daughters of B.R. Krishnamurthy Rao seeking a share in the joint family property. The plaintiffs, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Namdeo Bhukan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Vaishali Vinayak Kadam under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...