Search Results for "haemorrhagic shock"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Killing Wife with Stone. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Nandlal Bajranlal Sainy, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Pushpadevi, and sentenced to life imprisonment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony was not corroborated by other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants for the murder of Mayur Damle under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and for assaul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Convict in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Insanity Plea. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramchandra Shenfadu Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Sessions Case No.26/2009 for the murder of his mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Appellants for Murder and Kidnapping in Gang-Related Killing. Life imprisonment confirmed for murder under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and kidnapping under Section 364 read with 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony.

The Appellants, Balvindersingh Balvirsingh Rathod, Diljit Babusingh Labhana, Raina Asaraf Khan, and Bhalchandra Haridas Mahale, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 302, 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Yeshwant Mohite on 22nd December 2011. The appellants, Rahul Shinde and Ashok Shinde, were convicted under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Juvenile Justice Act — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Accused Was 17 Years Old at Time of Offence and Entitled to Be Treated as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

The appellant, Vijay Ramchandra Diwar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a relative with enmity and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Khushal @ Anant Chindu Bhunde, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Subhash Somaji Bandal. The pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Civil Application in PIL Challenging Order to Destroy Tigress Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Permission to Hunt Man-Eater Tigress Upheld as Chief Wildlife Warden’s Satisfaction Was Based on Relevant Material Without Overstepping Statutory Powers.

The petitioner, Dr. Jerryl Avinash Banait, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging an order dated 9.10.2017 passed by the Chief Wildlife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Land Dispute — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient. Brothers convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for killing neighbour; court finds motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao Bapuso Patil and Vilas @ Balaso Bapuso Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Bhanudas under ...