Search Results for "first informant"

2427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.935 OF 2014

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay considered three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Aliba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 144, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Sudhakar on 19.08.2011. The informant Devidas (PW1) had a dispute with accused nos. 1, 4, and 5 over a field taken ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Appellant in SC/ST Act Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out. Allegations of Casteist Abuses and Cheating Found Vague and Civil in Nature Under Sections 3(1)(f)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act and Sections 406, 420, 506 IPC.

The appellant, Smt. Dharmishtha Bafna, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atroc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PC Act Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Babulal Pardeshi, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik, in Special Case No.11 of 2012 for offences under Sections 7, 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Appellant in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Found to Be an Afterthought in a Property Dispute.

The appellant, Kadubal Govind Gore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrociti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder by Electric Shock. Accused Challenged Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration, Arguing Accidental Electrocution.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judg...