Search Results for "exhaustive grounds"

1078 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1078 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment in Partition Suit — Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Disallowed as It Would Change Nature of Suit Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC

The petitioner, Raju Danchand Bardia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13th October 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. Single Judge Holds Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 Not Exhaustive and Maintains Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioner, M/s. Modern Anitasha Electronics, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal in Provincial Insolvency Act Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence. The High Court's limited power under Section 75(1) first proviso does not allow disturbing findings of fact, and a wrong decision on facts is according to law.

The appeal arose from insolvency proceedings in which the petitioning creditor sought annulment of two mortgages executed by the insolvents, one for R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...