Search Results for "eviction grounds"

1031 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1031 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Tenant's Petition to Withdraw Plea of Permanent Tenancy in Eviction Proceedings. Amendment Sought After 12 Years Held Barred by Laches and Lack of Bona Fides Under G.D.D. Buildings (L.R.E.) Act, 1968.

The petitioner, a tenant, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Rent Controller, Panaji, dated 23.7....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Non-User and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's occasional use of premises does not constitute continuous residence; landlord's need for own use justified eviction.

The dispute arises from a suit for eviction filed by the landlord (respondent) against the tenant (petitioner) under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodgi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Eviction Orders for Non-Payment of Rent. Tenant Failed to Deposit Arrears Despite Statutory Protection Under Section 12(3)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, a tenant of two shop blocks since 1977-1978, was sued for eviction by the respondent landlords for non-payment of rent from 01-08-1997...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...