Search Results for "delayed pension"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.

The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...