Search Results for "delay penalty"

1477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Time Was Essence of Contract; Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld. Breach by Buyer in Agreements to Sell Land in Gurgaon Leads to Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Refund of Earnest Money.

The case involves a dispute over two agreements to sell agricultural land in Gurgaon, executed on 17.02.2004, between the appellants (sellers) and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reference of Industrial Dispute as Stale After 14-Year Delay. Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Vitiated Due to Inordinate Delay Without Justification.

The petitioner, M/s Bata India Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 31.03.2015 made by the State Government under Section 10 of the Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision That Appellate Tribunal Has Implied Power to Stay Penalty Recovery Pending Appeal. Section 254 Income-tax Act's Appellate Jurisdiction Includes Incidental Power to Grant Stay to Prevent Frustration of Appeal.

The matter arose from penalty proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer imposed penalties on the assessee, M.K. Mohammed Kunh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BARC Engineer for Sanctioning Non-Existent Works and Causing Financial Loss to Government. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was proportionate to the gravity of the charges of fraud and cheating proved in the departmental inquiry.

The petitioner, Madhukar G. Wagh, was initially appointed in May 1958 as a Senior Scientific Assistant in the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Go...