Search Results for "defective show cause notice"

359 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Application Under MOFA — Holds That Competent Authority Cannot Reject Application on Grounds of Missing Documents After Issuing Notice, and That Lack of Occupation Certificate Is Not a Bar to Grant of Deemed Conveyance.

The petitioner, ALJ Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order Due to Defective Advertisement Under Rule 99 of Company Court Rules, 1959. Failure to Advertise in Correct Name of Company Violates Mandatory Requirement and Cannot Be Cured by Inherent Powers.

The appeal challenged an order dated 21 June 2018 by which the learned Company Judge allowed Company Petition No. 829 of 2003 filed by SICOM Limited f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer to Hold Fresh Enquiry After Termination Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice. Reinstatement Ordered but Back wages Made Dependent on Outcome of Fresh Enquiry.

The petitioner, Sanjeevan Gramin Vaidyakiya & Samajik Sahayata Pratisthan, challenged an order dated 23.12.2011 passed by the learned Presiding Office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...