KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
Search Results for "court criticism"
586 result(s) found
Found 586 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition and First Appeal Challenging Stop Work Notice and Revocation of Commencement Certificate for Public Parking Lot Construction; Considers Whether Deemed Permission Under Regulation 6(4) of DCR 1991 Was Obtained and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated. The Court Examines Legal Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 51 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, in Context of Completed Construction of 15 Upper Floors of PPL Based on Incentive FSI Under Clause 24 of Regulation 33.
27 Jan 2016The matter arose from construction activities undertaken by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited on Plot No.5B+6 at Worli, Mumbai, involving a high-...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.
23 Jul 2019The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Permission to File Written Statement Beyond Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory; Legal Representatives of Deceased Defendant Allowed to File Written Statement as No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.
18 Nov 2019The petitioner, Subhash Dhanraj Sankla, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property owned by Rhoda Phiroze Noble. The ori...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
8 Apr 2013The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...
- 73
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in University Appointment Case Due to Non-Binding UGC Regulations. Appointment of Vice Chancellor Upheld as Sardar Patel University Act, 1955 Does Not Prescribe Qualifications and State Has Not Adopted UGC Regulations Through Legislation.
3 Mar 2022The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of Sardar ...
- 493
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.
12 May 2023The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...
- 126
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.
20 Jul 2016The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Amendment) Act, 1996. Petitioner Trade Unions Contend Amendment is Retrograde and Repugnant to Central Act, Requiring Presidential Assent.
10 Oct 2006The Bombay High Court, in its Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, heard three writ petitions filed by trade unions namely Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sangh...
- 16
