Search Results for "cooperative society redevelopment"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order of Reference to Arbitration in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction. Court Holds That Disputes Involving a Housing Society and Its Members Regarding Development Agreement Are Arbitrable Under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment arises from two appeals filed against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court referring the parties to arbitration under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...