Search Results for "conversion date"

1208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Jaipur Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Conversion Charges Refund Case — Land Use Change Required Payment Under Section 173-A of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. Court Holds That Conversion Charges Were Validly Demanded and Respondents Not Entitled to Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Jaipur Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation for Land Conversion Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Petitioner's Application Under Section 95(2) Must Be Decided Within Three Months.

The petitioner, Abdul Rehman S/o Gousuddin Bidri, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Amendment of Plaint to Add Alternative Claim Despite Limitation Bar. All necessary facts already pleaded; interest of justice warranted amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a commercial transaction where the appellants, L. J. Leach and Company Ltd., filed a suit for damages against the respondents, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Ryotwari Patta under Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948. The matter involves interpretation of revisional powers under Section 7(c) and the binding effect of earlier judicial orders on the same grant.

The writ petitioner challenged the order dated 27.11.2021 of the Commissioner of Land Administration, which cancelled the ryotwari patta earlier grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010218752018_1

...