Search Results for "contradiction"

202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Case on Grounds of Insufficient Evidence. Conviction for sexual assault overturned due to inconsistencies in the prosecution’s evidence and credibility doubts.

The Bombay High Court overturned the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre, accused of sexual assault under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case. Detailed Judgment Reaffirms Legal Principles under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

The Supreme Court of India has upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a case involving the dishonour of a cheque, originally filed by the appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Rape and Sexual Assault Case. The court set aside the conviction due to inconsistencies in the victim's and witnesses' testimonies, a lack of corroborating evidence, and procedural lapses by the lower court.

The Bombay High Court overturned the conviction of the appellant for charges under Sections 448 and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Decision on Fraudulent Caste Certificate. Judicial review upholds the cancellation of caste certificate and denies electoral candidate’s fraudulent claim for reserved category benefits.

The court dismissed a petition challenging the decision of a scrutiny committee that cancelled a caste certificate claimed fraudulently by an electora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Overturns Conviction in Sexual Offense Case Involving Minor. Court finds significant inconsistencies and delays in prosecution's case, leading to acquittal of the accused.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, overturned the conviction of Rajesh Murlidhar Lonbale. The appellant was previously found guilty...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tribunal Upholds Employee's Right to Voluntary Retirement. High Court affirms Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, granting employee voluntary retirement amidst personal hardship.

The petitioners challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order granting voluntary retirement to the respondent. The respondent, employed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Declares Maharashtra's RTE Amendment Rules 2024 Ultra Vires. Maharashtra's new education amendment restricting private school admissions overturned, safeguarding disadvantaged children's right to education.

The petitions challenge the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Rules, 2024, which add provisos to Rules 4(5) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Court Modifies Conviction in Murder Case: From Life Imprisonment to Eight Years Rigorous Imprisonment. Amravati Court reclassifies offense from murder to culpable homicide, reducing sentences of two sons while father's appeal abated due to death.

The appeal case from the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati (Sessions Case No. 52/2015), Ravindra, Ashish, and Vaibhav were convicted under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal by State Against Acquittal in Sudesh Patil and Manoj Waghela Corruption Case. The State of Maharashtra appeals against the acquittal of Sudesh Patil and the conviction of Manoj Waghela in a bribery case involving pension payments.

This is a judgment concerning two criminal appeals stemming from the same case. The State of Maharashtra has appealed the acquittal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...