Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land. The court held that the petitioner had no legal right to the land and the demolition order was valid under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioner, Manish Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order dated 6th October 2010 passed by the Deputy Chief Eng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Cotton Federation Dispute — Labour Court Order Quashed for Interfering at Show Cause Stage. Show Cause Notice Proposing Punishment Cannot Be Challenged Under MRTU & PULP Act Before Final Order.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 29/02/2010 of the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case for Theft of Vehicle Purchased at Auction — Insurer Cannot Repudiate Claim on Ground of Lack of Insurable Interest When Premium Was Accepted and Policy Issued Reflecting Transferee's Name.

The appellant, M/s. Balwant Singh & Sons, purchased a vehicle at an auction conducted by ICICI Bank, the hypothecatee, after the original owner (third...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Dispute Over Possession of Properties — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Failure to Record Reasons for Dispensing with Notice Renders Ex Parte Injunction Void.

The appellant, Mr. Srinivas Adhikeshavulu Dalvai, was the defendant in a suit filed by M/s Anushka Constructions Pvt Ltd (the respondent/plaintiff) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act - Reservation for Garden Purposes Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period

The petitioners, owners of final plot No.481 in Town Planning Scheme No.1 at Karad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Specific Performance Suit by Reversing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding Interpreted Together as Supplementary, with Appellants Found Ready and Willing to Perform Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from four suits filed by the Appellants for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 20.03.1991 and memoranda of understandi...