RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "closure not business closure"
635 result(s) found
Found 635 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Insurance Claim and Sundry Receipts Held Not Directly Related to Business Profits, Rental Income Treated as Business Income, Retrenchment Compensation Held Revenue Expenditure.
18 Jun 2010The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation Without Notice. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.
11 Feb 2022The petitioner, Dee Vee Projects Ltd., a public limited company engaged in infrastructure development, was registered under the erstwhile State Sales ...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Finds Perversity in Force Majeure Finding. Court holds that the Arbitrator's conclusion that the lessee's termination was not under the force majeure clause was perverse, but upholds other findings on delayed approvals and property tax dues.
19 Oct 2020The case arises from a lease deed dated 1st August 2013 between Reliable Spaces Pvt Ltd (the Petitioner/Lessor) and Evonik India Pvt Ltd (the Responde...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Sale Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.1.88 crore with interest for breach of contract, rejecting grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 May 2015The petitioner, Sahara Hospitality Limited (formerly Batra Hospitality Private Limited), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...
- 75
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.
4 Jan 2012The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MP Power Management Company, Upholds Termination of Power Purchase Agreement for Non-Compliance of Conditions Subsequent. The Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with a non-statutory contract and that the termination was justified as the seller failed to fulfill conditions within the extended period.
1 Jan 2022The appellant, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, a wholly owned government company responsible for bulk purchase of electricity in Madhya Pradesh...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
6 May 2026The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...
- 193
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.
12 Aug 2015The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Industrial Court's Rejection of Interim Relief in ULP Complaint Over Jurisdiction Under Schedule II of MRTU & PULP Act. Workers Alleged Forced Resignations and Unfair Labour Practices; Court Framed Issues on Whether Industrial Court Could Consider Terminations Under Schedule II.
3 Jul 2019(1) Background: The dispute arose from an industrial complaint filed by eleven workers against their employer, M/s Motherson Advanced Tooling Solution...
