KAHC010085932008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "bona fide declaration"
1006 result(s) found
Found 1006 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Winding-Up Petitions by Creditor in Company Law Dispute — Official Liquidator's Report Not a Bar. Court held that a creditor can withdraw a winding-up petition before advertisement under Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956, even after the Official Liquidator's report, as the petition remains a private dispute until advertisement.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns two company applications (CA 80/2012 and CA 81/2012) filed by Pavlova Estates Private Limited (the applicant) seeking withdrawal...
- 181
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo-Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings in ISKCON Property Dispute – Judge's Integrity Questioned via Anonymous Letter. Court Holds that Sending Photographs with Inflammatory Captions Amounts to Blackmail and Scandalizing the Court, Prima Facie Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
16 Apr 2015The High Court of Karnataka initiated suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings against certain individuals associated with ISKCON and advocates, arising...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.
28 Jul 2016The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...
- 85
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Fraud Case — Upholds Rights of Purchaser Under Unregistered Sale Deed Against Subsequent Purchaser. Vendor's Double Sale and Fraudulent Conveyance Set Aside; Court Holds That Registration Relates Back to Date of Execution and Minor's Contract Is Voidable, Not Void, Under Specific Circumstances.
19 Jul 2024The case involves a property dispute where the appellants (plaintiffs) purchased suit land from respondent no.2 (vendor) via a sale deed executed on 0...
- 640
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Remand Order in Recovery Certificate Proceedings Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Due to Absence of Final Adjudication. Section 101 Recovery Proceeding Remand Upheld as the Court Finds No Final Determination on Genuineness of No Dues Certificate Warrants Interference.
25 Oct 2023The writ petitions challenged orders dated 31 December 2021 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, allowing revision applic...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case: Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applies to Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance When Relief of Permanent Injunction Was Sought in Previous Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff's entitlement to seek specific performance existed at the time of the first suit, and failure to include it bars the second suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.
17 Jan 2025The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 24.01.2007 between M/s Chemplast Cuddalore Vinyls Limited (respondent no.1/original plaintiff) and ...
- 892
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.
10 Aug 2018The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Considers Second Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Joint Family Property and Competing Claims Under Two Wills. The Court Examines the Effect of a Prior Family Settlement and Memorandum of Partition on the Plaintiff’s Right to a Share in the Estate of the Deceased Female Coparcener.
4 Apr 2016Background — The dispute concerned joint family properties left by Jethmalji, who died in November 1956, survived by his widow Smt. Heerabai and ste...
- 27
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)
17 Mar 2023The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...
- 26
