COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017
28 Jan 2020The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...
Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"
2212 result(s) found
Found 2212 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Sep 2023The applicant, Parekh Plastichem Distributors LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appoin...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.
6 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership and Company Matters — Mediation Failed. Court holds that disputes arising from Deed of Family Settlement and Partnership Deed are arbitrable and that non-signatory companies can be joined as parties to arbitration.
20 Jun 2013The case involves two groups of the same family, the CPS group (Chandrakant Phoolchand Sanghvi and others) and the APS group (Anilkumar Phoolchand San...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.
19 Mar 2013The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.
28 Sep 2015The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Satisfaction of Mortgage and Reassignment of Property. The Arbitral Award Had Directed the Mortgagor to Reassign Premises and Pay Outstanding Dues, Which the Legal Heirs of the Deceased Petitioner Contested on Various Grounds Including Improper Impleadment of Legal Representatives.
29 Oct 2010The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 1st December,...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.
31 Jul 2026The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicated Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute. The Award Held Lessee Liable for Tax Demands Arising from Disallowance of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act, 1961.
9 Jan 2015The matter pertains to an arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicatur...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.
4 Mar 2015The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...
- 42
