Search Results for "addendum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "addendum"

158 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 158 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner's Suit Not Barred by Limitation Due to Part Performance. Order I Rule 10(2) CPC Impleading Upheld as Proposed Defendant Had Direct Interest in Property.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Mrs. P. Swapna, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.06.2020 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in agreement conferred jurisdiction on Hyderabad courts, not Bombay High Court.

22 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Aniket SA Investments LLC, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Under Section 127 of Companies Act for Non-Payment of Dividend Due to Pending Dispute Between Shareholder Groups. The court held that the defence under section 127(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, which allows non-payment if there is a dispute regarding the right to receive the dividend, must be considered before issuing process.

22 Apr 2019

The case involves three criminal applications filed by the directors of Man Industries (India) Limited (MIIL) seeking quashing of notices and process ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Domestic Bidder Challenging Contract Award to Foreign Company. Price Preference Claim Rejected for Non-Compliance with Bid Conditions.

19 Oct 2011

The Petitioner, Punj Lloyd Ltd., a domestic company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the award of a contract b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trade Name Dispute Over 'Bhagat Tarachand' — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Proprietorship and Likelihood of Confusion. The court restrained defendants from using the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' or any deceptively similar name in their restaurant business at Inorbit Mall, Vashi, pending suit.

25 Aug 2010

The plaintiff, Vanita Dilip Chawla, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the registered proprietor of the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

20 Apr 2010

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Damages Against Shipowner and Agent Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Failure to Prove Negligence. The court held that the plaintiffs, as endorsees of bills of lading, could not sue the shipowner for short delivery without establishing negligence or breach of contract.

19 Aug 2005

The plaintiffs, Union of India and Union Potash Ltd., filed a suit against Arimar Lines Ltd. (the shipowner) and Chowgule Brothers (the agent) for dam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Acquisition for BEST Undertaking's Bus Depot Held Valid Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld the government's notification under Sections 4, 6, and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquiring land belonging to a co-operative housing society for a bus depot, holding that the public purpose of providing transport facilities outweighs private interest.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Laxman Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Limited and its Chairman R.P. Shirambekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Directorate Appeals in FERA Contravention Cases Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Held that mere suspicion cannot substitute proof and that adjudication proceedings under FERA must be initiated within a reasonable time.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India through the Enforcement Directorate against orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Fore...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)