Search Results for "Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976"

162 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of Estate Officer Under Public Premises Act in Eviction Proceeding by Mumbai Port Authority. Lease Granted in 1962 for Construction of Building Does Not Confer Rent Control Protection as Premises Belong to Port Authority Exempted Under Section 4(1) of Bombay Rent Control Act and Section 4(4)(a) Exception Not Applicable.

5 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Raian Nogi Karanjawala and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Estate Officer (respondent No.17) dated 22.11....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

10 Mar 2022

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

5 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property — Purchaser Failed to Demonstrate Willingness to Complete Transaction. Readiness without willingness is insufficient for specific performance under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff insisted on adjustment of loans without calling upon defendant to pay its share.

8 Apr 2019

The suit was filed by G Ram Construction Company (plaintiff) against Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt Ltd (defendant) for specific performance of an agre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 17/06/2016 in WP Nos.54609-54610/2014(ULC) dismissed as no error apparent on record.

22 Feb 2019

The review petitions were filed by M/s Vivekananda Foundation (R), claiming to be the allottee of a portion of land in Sy.Nos.81 and 82 of Kasaba Hobl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit for Want of Proof of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff Failed to Aver and Prove Continuous Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

15 Feb 2019

The appellant, Mehboob-ur-Rehman (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Implementation of RTI Order Despite Non-Compliance by Public Authority — Government Officers Cannot Frustrate Legislative Intent of Right to Information Act, 2005. The court held that the State Information Commission's order under the RTI Act must be implemented and officers cannot defeat the purpose of the Act.

27 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Vivek Vishnupant Kulkarni, an advocate associated with a public trust running two schools with about 1600 students, filed an applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in Urban Land Ceiling Exemption Case — Quashes Penalty and Directions Restricting Registration and Plan Sanction. Exemption Under Section 20(1) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Is Complete and Cannot Be Subjected to Further Conditions or Penalties.

8 Jul 2010

The petitioners, owners of land in Thane District, challenged two letters: one dated 11-2-2009 directing the Municipal Council and Sub-Registrar not t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reservation of Tenements for Government Nominees in Urban Land Ceiling Case. Reservation of 10% Tenements for Government Nominees Upheld as Valid Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

24 Aug 2006

The petitioners, Komalsingh Sonusingh Pardeshi and M/s. Makhija & Vora Associates, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Government's Insistence on Reservation of Tenements Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Scheme. Scheme Sanctioned Under Section 21 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for Weaker Sections; Government's Demand for 10% Reservation of Built-Up Area for Its Nominees Held Unenforceable After Scheme Implementation.

7 Apr 2005

The 1st petitioner, Pratapsingh R. Pardeshi, was the owner of a property bearing survey no.119+204+205+206/1+209/1, plot no.5, situated at Lohegaon, T...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)