Search Results for "Section 363"

795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Appellant No.2's conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC confirmed based on consistent testimony of prosecutrix and medical evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl in POCSO Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367, 201 IPC and POCSO Act affirmed based on DNA evidence and circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, unnatural sex, and murder of a 5-year-old girl by her neighbor, the appellant Dattatraya @ Datta Ambo Rokad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 Read with 511 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Story of Attempted Rape.

The appellant, Shankar Thakre, was convicted by the Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial 33/2002 for offences under Section 363 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom Under Section 364A, 34 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused Based on Test Identification, Handwriting, and Call Records, Sentencing Them to Life Imprisonment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard Criminal Appeal Nos. 147 of 2006 and 134 of 2006, along with Criminal Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Convictions for Child Marriage, Kidnapping, and Extortion in Village Custom Case. Accused villagers convicted under IPC and Child Marriage Restraint Act for forcibly marrying minor girl against her will and extorting money from mothers.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of nine accused persons for offences under Sections 363, 366, 384 read with 34 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...