Search Results for "Section 124-A Railways Act"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Deceased was a bona fide passenger who fell due to sudden jerk and jolt, not a trespasser, under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, South Western Railway, Hubli, against the order dated 28.12.2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Held Untoward Incident. Railway's Defence of Self-Inflicted Injury Rejected as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger with Valid Ticket Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the parents of the deceased Dinesh, who died on 24.05.2013 after falling from a running train. The deceased had purchased a jo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Held Untoward Incident. Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Negligence Not a Defence.

The appeal was filed by the mother of the deceased, Dinesh, challenging the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected her claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Death as Untoward Incident Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation as Bona Fide Passenger Despite Absence of Ticket.

The case involves an appeal filed by the mother of the deceased, Arju Bharat Shende, against the dismissal of her claim for compensation by the Railwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Case. Deceased Held to be Bonafide Passenger; Criminal Act Exception Not Attracted Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, Western Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which awarded compensat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Dismissal for Technical Grounds — Affidavit Language Issue Not Fatal to Claim. Claimant's lack of understanding of English affidavit does not defeat compensation claim under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 when other evidence exists.

The appellant, Shilabai wd/o Raghunath Hemne, lost her husband in a railway accident on 04.10.2002. She filed a claim for compensation under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...