Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Amputation. Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Lost Ticket; Sudden Jerk Leading to Fall Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Kishor Vishnu Bondre, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a train ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Railway Accident Claim — Illiteracy and Poverty Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Section 17(2) of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

The appellant, Saraswati Giri, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, following the death of her son in a tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the accident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

The appellant, Dalit s/o Tukaram Mudkhede, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for injuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger. Burden of Proof on Railways to Show Negligence or Criminal Act Not Discharged Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, wife, son, and married daughter of Thippareddy, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, seeking compensation for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Sets Aside Tribunal's Finding of Rashness. Death of Passenger Falling from Train at Station Held to be 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 124A of the Indian Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, being the widow and sons of the deceased Vikram Darkonde, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Failure to Consider Evidence. Tribunal's Rejection of Compensation Claim Set Aside as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred Due to Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellants, sons of the deceased Dhondabai, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the death ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case, Enhances Interest Rate from 6% to 9% Per Annum. The Court held that interest is compensation for being denied the use of money and modified the award of the Railway Claims Tribunal under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, the mother of the deceased, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal after her son died in a train accident on 28.12.2013. The ...