Search Results for "Omissions"

1955 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1955 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Bhaurao Sadanshiv, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 2005 for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 379 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Nilesh, whose body was found in a suitcase near a temple. The appellants, Prajakta Shyam Shelar and Prafulla Mahend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeals in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Appellants Challenge Reliability of Recovery and Chain of Custody, Arguing Investigation Delays Vitiate Conviction.

The case arose from a violent incident on 19.1.2011 in Timki Mochipura, Nagpur, where Dinesh Shendekar was killed and his brother Deva and another per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Delivers Judgment in State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Trespass Case under Sections 302, 447 read with 34 IPC

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of three respondents who were charged with the murder of Kanta, the younger brother of accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony suffered from contradictions and improvements.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 47 of 1999 for offences pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 447, 302, 506 r/w 34 IPC. Appellants Contended that Eyewitness Testimony Was Unreliable Due to Non-Mention in FIR and Unnatural Conduct.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a criminal appeal filed by Veeresh and Mallesh against their conviction under sections 447, 302, ...