Search Results for "Negative Forensic Evidence"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Devidas Malche, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.25 of 2014 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal Against Look-Out Circulars Issued by Banks Due to Default of Rs.2800 Crores. Court Holds that Petitioner’s Concession to Banks’ Power and Pending Suits Justify Travel Restriction Under Office Memoranda.

The intra-court appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged two Look Out Circulars issued by Bank of Baroda and Punjab National...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Police Head Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Ramesh Tukaram Wagh, a Police Head Constable, in Special Case (PCA) No.4/2012 by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivanna, was convicted by the Fast Track Court (Sessions), Kanakapura, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naga @ Nagaraj @ Nagesh, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-V, Mysuru in S.C. No. 208 of 2005 for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Conscious Possession of Heroin. Recovery of Contraband from Bag Not Linked to Accused as Independent Witnesses Turned Hostile and Procedural Lapses in Search and Seizure Under NDPS Act, 1985.

The appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai, against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.10.2008 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory coupled with motive and recovery of weapon established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Satish Ramchandra Bavbande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Neeta, a 16-year-old girl, under Sec...