Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Company Seeking Dismissal of Complaint Filed by Employees Who Accepted Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Employees who accepted VRS benefits with a declaration waiving all claims cannot continue with a pending complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Burroughs Wellcome (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court which dismissed its application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Employee's Petition in Misappropriation Case — Reinstatement with Continuity but No Back Wages Upheld. Industrial Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 is Limited and Cannot Interfere with Labour Court's Finding of Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Ranjit Baburao Awhad, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). He was dismissed from serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Pharmacists in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of daily-wage pharmacists appointed through proper selection held to be unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, and reinstatement with back wages upheld.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (petitioners) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Labour Court dated 25-8-2000 in Complaint (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Sanitation Worker Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Model Standing Orders under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 held inapplicable to municipal hospital as it is not an industrial establishment.

The petitioner, a sanitation worker at Talera Hospital, Chinchwad, filed a complaint under Items 5, 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Failure to Provide Alternate Employment to Medically Unfit Driver Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which declared that the Corporation was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Newspaper Company Challenging Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice. Employer's Failure to Implement Bachhawat Award and Deny Permanency to Workman Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5, 7, and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited, a registered company publishing daily newspapers from Nagpur, challenged the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employees' Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court's Refusal to Register Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act. Industrial Court Cannot Reject Revision at Threshold on Ground of Interlocutory Order.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees challenging the refusal of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, to register their Revision (U...