Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Hotel Construction Under MRTP Act. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid building permission and previous Division Bench upholding notice under Section 53(1) of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 leads to dismissal.

The petitioner, Satish D. Darekar, was served with a notice under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NIT Communication in Gunthewari Regularization Case — Reservation Lifted by Prior Government Resolution. Petitioner Society's plots held not reserved for Higher Education as reservation was lifted under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 read with Gunthewari Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Gousiya Labour Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., developed a residential layout on Survey Nos. 52 and 54, Mouza-Bidipeth, Nagpur, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Property Owner in Suit Challenging Demolition Notice Under MRTP Act. Owner is Necessary Party as Tenant's Challenge to Notice Directly Affects Owner's Rights Over Property.

The petitioners, tenants of the ground floor of a property, filed Regular Civil Suit No.418 of 2023 challenging a notice dated 10/03/2023 issued by th...