Search Results for "MPDA Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MPDA Act"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Satisfying Material and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order based on stale and trivial offences fails to establish that the detenu is a 'dangerous person' under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, etc. Act, 1981.

16 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sharavan @ Rahul Ashok Burungale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22nd November 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Polic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Not Affecting Public Order. The court held that failure to consider bail conditions and lack of public order disturbance in in-camera statements renders the detention order invalid under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Paras Rajendra Apte, challenged his detention order dated 09.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Yavatmal under Section 3(2) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Convict Seeking Premature Release Under Remission Policy — MCOC Act Convict Not Entitled to Benefit of 2006 Policy as Subsequent 2010 Policy Excludes Organized Crime Offenders.

5 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Arun Gulab Gawli, a convict under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act), filed a writ petition seeking prema...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Based on Single Criminal Case Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Possibility of Bail and Continued Dangerous Activities.

30 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Mohsin Anwar Khan @ Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 24th February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Delayed Action. Preventive detention order set aside due to unexplained delay of four months and failure to supply legible translated documents.

9 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Bandu Kathalu Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 17.01.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Compelling Material and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider that the petitioner was already in judicial custody and there was no credible material to show likelihood of release and resumption of dangerous activities.

19 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Vijay Rajendra Patil, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) by an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and In-camera Statements Not Verified. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the detenu's bail status and to verify in-camera statements vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the MPDA Act.

17 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Pravin @ Bhayya Pratap Shinde, challenged a preventive detention order dated 06/09/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat — Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Sustain Detention as 'Dangerous Person'.

15 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Vicky Satyawan Chavan @ Barkya, challenged a preventive detention order dated 08/07/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Anonymous Complaint and Stale Incidents Insufficient to Sustain Preventive Detention. The court held that reliance on an unverified anonymous complaint and two criminal cases where the detenu was on bail did not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

25 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged a detention order dated 25-2-2004 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous A...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)